Protecting systems for different size disasters

There is a lot of complexity in hardening IT systems to survive different types of disasters. They balance user experience, cost, complexity, and risk tolerance. Which strategies might work best?

Talking in metaphors: A major disaster where a lot of other people are impacted, a storm with essentially a transient effect, or a self-induced fire where we ourselves accidentally burned a room or a whole building.

This blog article exists to provide static images of the slides used in the presentation

Video

Presentation Slides

 What are you afraid of?












Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Installing the RNDIS driver on Windows 11 to use USB Raspberry Pi as network attached

Understanding your WSL2 RAM and swap - Changing the default 50%-25%

Almost PaaS Document Parsing with Tika and AWS Elastic Beanstalk