Associating Personas - identifying when two "people" are the same person
Identifying the "same person" when they exist in multiple affiliates or
multiple contact channels can be messy with a set of tradeoffs. People
show up or interact with organizations with different personas. They may
be customers or incident reporters or marketing contacts or someone who
just happens to make an inquiry. Even customers / registered people may
exist as more than one person because of mergers, identity changes
personal choice, or system errors.
The speaker notes below represent a subset of the comments in the video.
Video
Associating Personas - Images
Organizations make people create accounts in order to bind those people to
permissions and preferences. Accounts may provide traceability from account
to person but they often don't provide the only link to that person.
People can create multiple accounts for various purposes. This means that an
account may be bound to a person but a person can be bound to more than one
account. Those accounts may have different contact information, email
address, or preferences. As an example, I have separate personal
Microsoft and XBOX Microsoft accounts.
Note that the account doesn't even guarantee a mapping to a person. Plenty
of people share banking, shopping, insurance, and other
accounts.
People may interact with an organization with their own identities or
anonymous identities, via marketing links or anonymized browsers, or other
means. Our total information about the activities of this person is the
combination of their customer activities and their
prospect or anonymous activities. The customer may do this
for a reason. The company may wish to bind together the customer and prospect
for better service, marketing, or other reasons.Organizations want to bind the various persons into a single person. The criteria for that match differ based on the use case. A match with legal documents or financial sharing will have a higher bar than a match used for cross-marketing or advertising suggestions. Advertising or marketing matches can be made with a different type of confidence than something type of match with legal impacts.
Systems or companies often give users/customers/partners a local
identifier. That person may have multiple identifiers across various
affiliates or systems. This problem will always exist as other
companies are bought or COTS software is purchased with its own identity
system. For these cases, we want to create a global identifier that is
attached to the people.
We want to assign global identifiers to people as they come into the
system. THis means we identifiers for people we know very little
about.
Some people will claim that you can push a universal identifier across
all systems and eliminate the debt represented by the local
identifiers. I personally don't see that as practical given the way
systems and organizations evolve.
Here we have decided that the marketing person is the same person as the
other two customer people. This is a case where we may attach an existing
global identifier to that person.
You can see this sometimes when as we acquire data about a contact. They
initially get their own identifier. Then later we know more about them. We
then obsolete their initial identifier and join them to the previously
existing identifier. The global identifier system must support
obsolete global identifier redirects or lookups. This makes it so the
observing systems don't have to update their global identifiers as they are
updated in the global management system.
There will be situations where we realize that a global identifier is
actually tied to more than one real person. In this case, we need to
split those people apart and make sure they have different global
identifiers. This can happen fairly often as you learn more about
individuals.
Identity splits can lead to complications in observing systems. It is
actually one of the reasons You may or may not want to keep the global
identifier in every system. You may instead rely on local identifier
lookups against the global identifier systems.
Comments
Post a Comment